Get the sample weekly report

Denial code · group CO

CO-151: The units or frequency billed exceed what the documentation or the payer's edits support

Short answer

CO-151 means the payer's edits found more units, or a higher frequency, than it will pay for that code, and nothing on the claim justified the extra. Medicare's medically unlikely edits and payer frequency policies are the usual source. Minutes keyed as units is the common cause, and a corrected claim fixes it. When the units are right and documented, the route is an appeal with the time log and the order.

Look up other codes in the denial code library.

Last reviewed by the Remitwright billing team. Editorial policy

  • Group CO · Contractual obligation

Group CO means contractual obligation: the balance is written off, not billed to the patient. The number is the reason; the two-letter group says who carries the balance.

Remark codes that usually come with CO-151

M53
The days or units of service are missing, incomplete or invalid
M86
Payment was already made for the same or a similar service within the payer's set time frame

Common causes

Units above the medically unlikely edit

CMS sets a medically unlikely edit (MUE) for many codes: the maximum units of service a provider would report for one patient on one date on the vast majority of correctly billed claims. CMS publishes most MUE values, keeps others confidential, and updates the files quarterly. A line over the value denies.

Minutes keyed as units

Timed codes are billed in units of a set number of minutes. A charge entry that types the minutes from the note into the units field bills several times the service. M53 usually accompanies it.

A frequency limit on the code

One per day, one per year, or one per episode. Bilateral procedures billed as two units where the payer wants one unit with modifier 50, or a repeat test billed as two units instead of two lines with modifier 91, trip the edit.

Drug and supply unit conversions

HCPCS billing units for drugs and supplies are defined per code, not per package or per dose as written on the vial. A claim that reports the package count or the dose in the wrong unit bills far too many or far too few. The payer's edit catches the too many.

Services split across lines or days that should not be

The same code on several lines for one date to get around a per-line edit, or units from two dates combined on one line. The payer's edit works per line or per date depending on the code, and either pattern can deny.

Documentation that does not support the count

The units are correct and the time log is not. Payers that review records on frequency denials deny when the note records no start and stop times or no count of procedures.

How to fix it and resubmit

  1. 1

    Check the units against the code definition and the edit

    Confirm how the code is counted (per timed unit, per session, per item, per dose unit) and look up the published MUE value or the payer's frequency policy for the date of service. Confidential MUE values will not be on the list; the payer can tell you the edit fired without telling you the number.

  2. 2

    Corrected claim when the count was keyed wrong

    Convert minutes to units, packages to HCPCS units, or two lines to one with modifier 50 as the payer requires, and resubmit with frequency code 7. Fix the charge entry rule that created the error so it does not recur next week.

  3. 3

    Separate lines with modifiers when the units are real

    Where the services on one date were distinct and the payer's edit is per line, report them on separate lines with the modifier that explains them (59 or an X modifier, 76, 91 as the case fits), with the documentation ready. Where the edit is per date, this does not help and the route is an appeal.

  4. 4

    Appeal with the time log and the order

    When the units are accurate and the record shows them, appeal with the note, the start and stop times or procedure count, the order and a short statement of why this patient needed that many. Payers decide these on the documentation, so send all of it the first time.

  5. 5

    Treat a benefit limit as a benefit limit

    If the payer's frequency rule is a plan limit rather than a coding edit, the claim is a CO-119 problem: confirm the accumulator and decide who owes the balance.

How to prevent it

  • Units validation in the scrubber against the published MUE table and each payer's frequency policies, refreshed when CMS posts the quarterly files
  • Charge entry rules that convert minutes to units for timed codes and package counts to HCPCS units for drugs and supplies
  • Bilateral and repeat-service rules per payer, so modifier 50, 76 or 91 and the unit count match what the payer's edit expects
  • Documentation templates that capture start and stop times or a procedure count for every timed or multi-unit code
Worked example · hypothetical

A CO-151 with M53 on an ABA treatment claim

A behavior technician delivers three hours of one-to-one treatment under the timed technician code, which counts in 15-minute units, so the session is twelve units. The charge entry clerk reads the session note and keys 180, the number of minutes, into the units field. The payer denies the line CO-151 with M53. The biller recalculates the units from the session time, sends a corrected claim with twelve units and frequency code 7, and the line pays. The practice management system then gets a rule that calculates units from minutes for every timed code. This is a hypothetical example.

Official text: the X12 claim adjustment reason code list. The meaning above is our paraphrase for billers; the list is the authority.

Next step

The fix for CO-151 sits with charge entry.

See charge entry

FAQ

Questions about CO-151

What is an MUE?

A medically unlikely edit is a value CMS sets for a code: the maximum units of service a provider would report for the same patient on the same date on the vast majority of correctly billed claims. Most values are published, some are kept confidential, and the files change quarterly. A line over the value denies.

Can I appeal a CO-151?

Yes, when the units are accurate and the record documents them. Send the note with times or counts, the order and a statement of need. When the units were keyed wrong, a corrected claim is the route and an appeal would be returned.

Why did the payer deny CO-151 instead of paying the allowed units?

An edit can deny the whole line rather than cut it back to the maximum. That is why a units error can cost the whole service, not just the extra units, and why the fix is a corrected claim with the right count.

Is CO-151 the same as CO-119?

No. CO-119 means the member's benefit for the period is used up. CO-151 means the units or frequency on this claim exceed what the payer will accept or what the documentation supports. Fixing a CO-151 needs the claim or the record; fixing a CO-119 needs the accumulator and the plan rules.

How do I bill the same procedure twice in one day without a CO-151?

Follow the payer's rule for that code. Some want two units on one line, others want two lines with modifier 76 or 91 on the second, and some will not pay a second one at all. Check the edit and the policy before the first claim, not after the denial.

Next step

Seeing a lot of CO-151?

Tell us the payer and the volume. Three quick questions, no patient data, a written answer from a biller who works that queue.

  • Three questions, about two minutes
  • No patient data, no software to buy
  • A written reply from a biller, not a sales deck

What happens next

  1. You answer three questions

  2. A billing specialist reads them

  3. A written reply by email

Prefer email? sales@remitwright.com

Seeing a lot of CO-151?

See where claims are getting stuck. No patient data needed.

Step 1 of 3

What do you bill for?

A little about your volume
How many providers? (Medical practice)

Trips per month? (NEMT)

Active clients? (Home care / home health)

Orders per month? (DME)

How many clinicians? (Behavioral health / therapy)

Claims per month, roughly? (Something else)

What's the biggest problem right now?

Where should we send the review?

Add details (optional)

We work inside your system; this tells us which login to ask for.

Please don't include patient information in this form.

  • No patient data requested
  • No obligation
  • Reply in writing
Get a billing review
Billing review

Get a billing review

See where claims are getting stuck. No patient data needed.

Step 1 of 3

What do you bill for?

A little about your volume
How many providers? (Medical practice)

Trips per month? (NEMT)

Active clients? (Home care / home health)

Orders per month? (DME)

How many clinicians? (Behavioral health / therapy)

Claims per month, roughly? (Something else)

What's the biggest problem right now?

Where should we send the review?

Add details (optional)

We work inside your system; this tells us which login to ask for.

Please don't include patient information in this form.

  • No patient data requested
  • No obligation
  • Reply in writing

BAA signed before any access, a user you create, MFA on. Patient data stays in your systems. How access works