Get the sample weekly report

03After the claim

Denial management services

Denial management services read every denial, find the cause, fix it, and get the claim paid or appealed inside the payer's window.

We'll look at your aging by bucket and tell you what's worth working.

We work from the remittance codes (CARC and RARC), not a guess, route each denial to the person who can fix it, and change the front-end process so the same denial stops coming back.

This work starts once the claim has gone out. Buy it on its own or pair it with our other billing services, stage by stage.

Last reviewed by the Remitwright billing team. Editorial policy

Stage 03 of 04

  1. Before the visit
  2. The claim
  3. After the claim
  4. Oversight

What we do

What denial management covers

  • Every denial logged from the remittance with payer, code, reason, dollar amount and appeal deadline
  • Root cause assigned from the CARC and RARC and the claim history: eligibility, authorization, coding, bundling, timely filing, documentation or payer error
  • Corrected claims sent for the fixable ones; written appeals with records for the ones that need argument
  • Payer-specific appeal processes followed: levels, forms, timeframes, where to send it
  • Peer-to-peer reviews scheduled for medical necessity denials, with the file prepared for your clinician
  • Appeal deadlines tracked so no denial dies of age
  • Denials by payer, reason and dollar on your weekly report, with the trend
  • Front-end fixes raised and tracked: the scrubber rule, the eligibility step or the documentation habit that would have prevented it

When it is skipped

What goes wrong when denial management is skipped

The denial that was logged and never worked

The PM system shows three hundred open denials. Each is tagged. None has an owner or a next date. Logging them felt like working them. Meanwhile the appeal windows are passing one by one.

Appealing the wrong thing

A CO-16 denial (information missing from the claim, or a billing error on it) is appealed with a letter about medical necessity. The payer wanted a corrected claim with the missing NDC. The appeal is denied, the window closes, and the claim is lost over a data field.

Working denials without fixing causes

The same payer denies the same code for the same reason, claim after claim. Each one is worked and paid on appeal. The practice is paying a biller to fight a battle a scrubber rule would have ended.

How we run it

How we run denial management

  1. Capture

    Denials pulled from each remittance and the payer portals, logged with reason and deadline.

  2. Classify

    Each denial gets a cause and a route: correct and resubmit, appeal with records, write off with reason, or send to the clinician.

  3. Work

    Fixable denials go back as corrected claims. Appeals go with the documentation the payer's policy asks for, through the channel it asks for.

  4. Chase

    Appeals are followed up at the payer's stated turnaround and escalated when they are late.

  5. Prevent

    The top denial reasons by dollar are turned into front-end changes, each with an owner.

What you receive

What you receive every week

  • Denial log with owners and dates

    Every open denial, its cause, its next action and who holds it.

  • Weekly denial report

    Denials received, worked, overturned and written off, by payer and reason, in dollars and counts.

  • Prevention list

    The front-end changes raised from denial causes and whether each one is done.

Worked example · hypothetical

Worked example: the recurring CO-4

A hypothetical dermatology practice gets CO-4 denials, which say the modifier does not fit the procedure code, from one commercial payer on destruction codes billed with modifier 59. The biller checks the payer's policy: it wants XS, not 59, for separate-site procedures. Open denials are corrected and resubmitted; a scrubber rule swaps the modifier for that payer going forward; the denial reason drops off the report.

Questions

Questions about denial management

What is a good denial rate?

Lower is better, and the honest answer depends on specialty and payer mix. More useful than one number is the trend and the share of denials that were preventable. We report both and name the causes.

In what order do you work denials?

By appeal deadline first, then by dollar value. Each denial is logged from the remittance with its deadline; fixable ones go back as corrected claims, and appeals go out once the records are gathered. The deadline is counted from the date on the denial, not the day someone opened it.

Do you appeal everything?

No. Some denials are correct, some are below the cost of appealing, and some need the clinician. We tell you which, with the reason, and write off only with your agreement and a recorded reason.

Can you take over a backlog of old denials?

Yes. We sort them by appeal deadline and dollar value, work the ones that can still be recovered, and give you a list of the ones that cannot, with why. Old A/R recovery covers the wider backlog.

What is the difference between a rejection and a denial?

A rejection never reached adjudication; it is a data error, fixed and resubmitted. A denial is an adjudicated decision not to pay, with a reason code, an appeal path and a deadline.

Will you stop the same denials recurring?

That is the point. Every denial reason that repeats gets a front-end fix: a scrubber rule, an eligibility step, a coding change or a documentation request to the clinician.

Can we outsource only denial management?

Yes, and it is a common place to start. Your staff keep charge entry and submission; a dedicated biller takes the denial queue, works each one to its cause inside the payer's appeal window and sends the cause back to whoever can stop it recurring. If the denials point to eligibility or coding, the review says so before the scope widens.

Next step

We'll look at your aging by bucket and tell you what's worth working.

Three quick questions. No patient data. A billing specialist reads every request and replies in writing.

  • Three questions, about two minutes
  • No patient data, no software to buy
  • A written reply from a biller, not a sales deck

What happens next

  1. You answer three questions

  2. A billing specialist reads them

  3. A written reply by email

Prefer email? sales@remitwright.com

Get my denials reviewed

We'll look at your aging by bucket and tell you what's worth working.

Step 1 of 3

What do you bill for?

A little about your volume
How many providers? (Medical practice)

Trips per month? (NEMT)

Active clients? (Home care / home health)

Orders per month? (DME)

How many clinicians? (Behavioral health / therapy)

Claims per month, roughly? (Something else)

What's the biggest problem right now?

Where should we send the review?

Add details (optional)

We work inside your system; this tells us which login to ask for.

Please don't include patient information in this form.

  • No patient data requested
  • No obligation
  • Reply in writing
Get a billing review
Billing review

Get a billing review

See where claims are getting stuck. No patient data needed.

Step 1 of 3

What do you bill for?

A little about your volume
How many providers? (Medical practice)

Trips per month? (NEMT)

Active clients? (Home care / home health)

Orders per month? (DME)

How many clinicians? (Behavioral health / therapy)

Claims per month, roughly? (Something else)

What's the biggest problem right now?

Where should we send the review?

Add details (optional)

We work inside your system; this tells us which login to ask for.

Please don't include patient information in this form.

  • No patient data requested
  • No obligation
  • Reply in writing

BAA signed before any access, a user you create, MFA on. Patient data stays in your systems. How access works