Glossary
Modifier XU
Short answer
Modifier XU is one of the four X modifiers CMS created as subsets of modifier 59. It tells the payer a procedure was distinct from another billed the same day because none of its work duplicates what the main procedure normally includes, so an NCCI bundling edit should not apply.
Browse more terms in the medical billing glossary.
Last reviewed by the Remitwright billing team. Editorial policy
Also written asXU modifier
XU belongs to the X{EPSU} family, four HCPCS modifiers CMS created under Change Request 8863, effective January 1, 2015, to split modifier 59 into narrower subsets. XE covers a separate encounter on the same date, XS a separate organ or structure, XP a different practitioner, and XU a service that stands apart because none of its work duplicates what the main procedure usually includes. CMS asks for the matching X modifier in place of 59 whenever one fits, and allows it on either code of an NCCI pair. CMS may also require a specific X modifier for code pairs at high risk of incorrect billing, and contractors may insist on the X modifiers in place of 59 for local program integrity reasons.
CMS’s modifier booklet limits XU, like 59, to narrow situations. A diagnostic procedure performed before a therapeutic one can stand alone when it is the basis for deciding to proceed, comes first without being mixed into the therapeutic work, and is not something the therapeutic procedure would have required anyway. A diagnostic procedure performed after a completed therapeutic one can stand alone when it is not a common, expected or necessary follow-up.
The misuse CMS names is reporting XU because the two code descriptors read differently. The codes in an edit pair always describe different procedures; at the same site in the same encounter they stay bundled unless one of the narrow situations above applies. A different diagnosis on each line is not enough either. The record has to show the separation, because an X modifier on the claim is a statement that the services did not overlap.
Modifier XU in practice
A physician performs a diagnostic procedure, and its findings are the reason for going on to a therapeutic procedure in the same session. The note shows the diagnostic work was finished first and decided the next step, so the column two code carries XU rather than 59. Hypothetical example.
FAQ
Questions about modifier XU
Can modifier XU and modifier 59 go on the same line?
Next step
Talk to a biller about this.
Three quick questions, no patient data. A billing specialist reads every request and replies in writing.
- Three questions, about two minutes
- No patient data, no software to buy
- A written reply from a biller, not a sales deck
You answer three questions
A billing specialist reads them
A written reply by email
Prefer email? sales@remitwright.com
Request received
Thanks. Your review request is in.
Reference . Quote it if you write to us about this request.
- A billing specialist reads your answers and replies by email.
- If a look at real claims makes sense, we agree read-only access under a BAA first.
- You get a written summary of what is worth working and what it would take. No commitment.
While you wait: see the sample weekly report or read how switching works. You can also download the sample weekly report (PDF).